Talk with us +91 99430 05101
Drop us an email
Enhance your solar energy output with state-of-the-art solar tracking systems. From single-axis to dual-axis models, these technologies dynamically orient your panels for optimal sun exposure. Learn how incorporating solar trackers can drastically improve the efficiency and overall performance of your solar power system in Surat and nationwide.
Key Factors for the Comparison
Solar Irradiance in Chennai:
- Chennai has an average solar irradiance of about 5.5 kWh/m²/day on a horizontal surface.
- Using a tilted panel or solar tracker improves energy capture.
Tilt Angle for Fixed Panels:
- The optimal tilt angle in Chennai (13° N latitude) is around 15°–20° for maximum year-round efficiency.
Solar Tracking System:
- A single-axis tracker adjusts the panel to follow the sun’s path east-to-west.
- A dual-axis tracker adjusts the panel in both east-west and north-south directions, keeping it perpendicular to sunlight.
Efficiency Increase:
- Single-axis tracking increases energy output by about 20–30%.
Dual-axis tracking increases it by about 30–40% compared to fixed systems.
Comparison Table
Parameter | Fixed Solar Panel (500W) | Single-Axis Tracking (500W) | Dual-Axis Tracking (500W) |
Daily Irradiance | 5.5 kWh/m²/day | 6.6 kWh/m²/day (20% more) | 7.15 kWh/m²/day (30% more) |
Panel Efficiency | 18% | 18% | 18% |
Energy Output per Day | 5.5 × 500 × 0.18 = 495 Wh | 6.6 × 500 × 0.18 = 594 Wh | 7.15 × 500 × 0.18 = 643.5 Wh |
Energy Output per Month | 495 × 30 = 14.85 kWh | 594 × 30 = 17.82 kWh | 643.5 × 30 = 19.305 kWh |
Energy Output per Year | 14.85 × 12 = 178.2 kWh | 17.82 × 12 = 213.84 kWh | 19.305 × 12 = 231.66 kWh |
Percentage Increase | Baseline | +20% | +30% |
Explanation of Calculations
Energy Output Formula:
- Energy output depends on the solar panel’s wattage, irradiance, and efficiency:
\text{Daily Energy Output} = \text{Irradiance} \times \text{Panel Capacity (500W)} \times \text{Efficiency (18% or 0.18)}
Fixed Panel:
- Chennai’s average irradiance is 5.5 kWh/m²/day. For a 500W panel with 18% efficiency:
5.5 kWh/m²/day×500 W×0.18=495 Wh/day5.5 \, \text{kWh/m²/day} \times 500 \, \text{W} \times 0.18 = 495 \, \text{Wh/day}5.5kWh/m²/day×500W×0.18=495Wh/day
Single-Axis Tracker:
- Single-axis tracking improves sunlight capture by approximately 20%:
5.5×1.2=6.6 kWh/m²/day5.5 \times 1.2 = 6.6 \, \text{kWh/m²/day}5.5×1.2=6.6kWh/m²/day 6.6 kWh/m²/day×500 W×0.18=594 Wh/day6.6 \, \text{kWh/m²/day} \times 500 \, \text{W} \times 0.18 = 594 \, \text{Wh/day}6.6kWh/m²/day×500W×0.18=594Wh/day
Dual-Axis Tracker:
- Dual-axis tracking improves sunlight capture by approximately 30%:
5.5×1.3=7.15 kWh/m²/day5.5 \times 1.3 = 7.15 \, \text{kWh/m²/day}5.5×1.3=7.15kWh/m²/day 7.15 kWh/m²/day×500 W×0.18=643.5 Wh/day7.15 \, \text{kWh/m²/day} \times 500 \, \text{W} \times 0.18 = 643.5 \, \text{Wh/day}7.15kWh/m²/day×500W×0.18=643.5Wh/day
Advantages of Solar Tracking Systems
- Higher Efficiency: A single-axis tracker boosts output by about 20%, while dual-axis boosts it by 30%. Over a year, this difference can significantly increase energy yield.
- Better Utilization of Space: Trackers maximize the energy output of each panel, reducing the need for additional panels.
- Cost Recovery: The additional energy generation helps offset the higher cost of tracking systems over time.
- Improved Performance During Peak Hours: By continuously orienting the panels perpendicular to the sun, trackers ensure optimal energy capture during the most productive daylight hours, leading to a more consistent and higher power output profile.
- Potential for Increased Revenue in Grid-Tied Systems: For systems connected to the electricity grid, the higher energy yield from tracking systems can translate directly into increased revenue through feed-in tariffs or net metering programs.
- Suitability for Various Terrains: While space requirements need consideration, tracking systems can sometimes be adapted to uneven or challenging terrains where fixed-tilt installations might be less efficient or more difficult to implement optimally.
Challenges with Tracking Systems
- Higher Initial Cost:
- Trackers involve additional mechanical and electronic components, increasing installation costs.
- Maintenance:
- Moving parts require regular maintenance to ensure optimal performance.
- Space Requirements:
- Trackers need more space to avoid shading from nearby panels.
- Increased Complexity: The integration of motors, sensors, and control systems adds complexity to the overall solar installation, potentially requiring specialized expertise for troubleshooting and repairs.
- Energy Consumption for Operation: Trackers themselves consume a small amount of energy to power the motors and control electronics, which slightly reduces the net energy output of the system.
- Potential for Harsh Weather Vulnerability: The moving parts of tracking systems can be more susceptible to damage from strong winds, heavy snow, or extreme weather conditions compared to fixed-tilt installations, potentially leading to downtime and repair costs.
Conclusion
In Chennai, a fixed solar panel system generates around 178.2 kWh/year for a 500W panel. By switching to a single-axis tracker, you can generate 213.84 kWh/year (+20%). A dual-axis tracker increases it further to 231.66 kWh/year (+30%).
If space and budget allow, dual-axis tracking is the most efficient option, especially for locations with high solar irradiance like Chennai. However, for lower costs and simpler setups, fixed panels with an optimal tilt angle remain a practical choice. Let me know if you want to dive deeper into costs or designs!